Someone below told WG, "Mo letters and other sources say that full adult child sex is OK." and WG answered:
"Baloney! Unless something has changed behind the scenes since I was in! No letter ever stated that it was ok to have adult/child sex!"
WG does not HAVE to respond. But why wouldn't he? If you were WG and had said what he said, and someone came back to you on it, you wouldn't hesitate to respond, would you?
I mean, are we here to discuss or aren't we? So let's disucuss the quotes. They are Mo's words. If WG doesn't want to discuss child/adult sex, he doesn't have to. But why deny it was ever said to be OK, then have the quotes put up and then refuse to answer?