Here you have the proof and he will probably end of saying, you made it up. Since he can't remember it, to him it proves it doesn't exist. No wonder he doesn't want to confront the truth.
> Someone below told WG, "Mo letters and
> other sources say that full adult child sex
> is OK." and WG answered:
> "Baloney! Unless something has changed
> behind the scenes since I was in! No letter
> ever stated that it was ok to have
> adult/child sex!"
> WG does not HAVE to respond. But why
> wouldn't he? If you were WG and had said
> what he said, and someone came back to you
> on it, you wouldn't hesitate to respond,
> would you?
> I mean, are we here to discuss or aren't we?
> So let's disucuss the quotes. They are Mo's
> words. If WG doesn't want to discuss
> child/adult sex, he doesn't have to. But why
> deny it was ever said to be OK, then have
> the quotes put up and then refuse to answer?