> so typical of an alcoholic, back and forth,
> up and down, never making anything clear,
> saying do this, then no, do that, then this
> is right, no its' wrong. That drove me crazy
> in the F., trying to follow berg everytime
> he got a new revelation and changed his
> mind. After awhile I didn't know whether I
> was coming or going.

I dont deny that David Berg certainly especially in his latter years displayed the classic symptoms of being an alcoholic. And any kind of sexual indulgences with children is abhorrant to me. I do not support incest and do not encourage that practice, Period!!!

Ive already gone on record as saying that. What really bothers you is I will not join the bash David Berg club. I noticed you side stepped the question I had asked in my response. Very typical!

You and some others are out for blood, plain and simple and the fact that you focus on this particular sin instead of talking about healing, and help for the victims and delieverence for abusers shows where you and some others hearts are really at.

For one thing there is a fund set aside for those in need and help I just wonder how many have contributed of those who just seem to want to attack David Berg and glorify his sins but do nothing in the practical to help others financially.

How about putting some money where your mouth is????? How about even supporting NDN board which quite a few of the antiberg folks use to spread their propoganda????

That would speak volumes instead of spending all this energy on villifying a dead man. And attacking those who are not willing to conform and to join the ministry of condemnation and accusation!!!!

> I can't believe after all those quotes you
> are still defending berg.

Its totally apparent to me you believe anything you want to about me so. In the past you have accused me of all sorts of things, so rest assured I lose no sleep at night wondering what you and some others think about me. And what I will be accused of next!

He actually had
> incest with his daughters and his
> grandaughter and fantasized about having sex
> with his mother. Then he implied it was ok -
> go for it if you have the faith for it - why
> not, he already was. Whether you want to
> call that a doctrine or not, doesn't matter
> to me, the facts are appalling enough. THe
> fact that YOU aren't appalled is appalling
> to me.

Sheesh in your eyes I cant do anything right, no how! Youd love it if Id join your little club, that would be the right thing according to you and some others, well dont hold your breath!!!