Apparently you (the person who posted the above) have not been around for a while.

Barney is no longer involved with NDN. I think he rejoined the Family a couple of years ago.

But your post is very interesting.

As I remember it was PD who originally brought up the question of whether or not HIV is the real cause of AIDS, and she received some flack for it.

However a lot of research has come and gone since then.

It is clear that HIV is a marker of AIDS.
Where HIV is present, AIDS is almost always present.

However there are many documented cases of AIDS where HIV is not present.

AIDS is a syndrome, a set of symptoms.
If someone's immune system no longer functions and they consequently fall victim to all sorts of infections, they have AIDS no matter what the cause.

In all cases of HIV related AIDS there is also Mycoplasmic infection. What's more in all cases of non-HIV AIDS there is also Mycoplasmic infection.

Thus AIDS is more related to the Mycoplasmic infection tnan it is to HIV.

In essence, the medical system has been centering all of its efforts on treating a peripheral infection rather than the actual causitive agent. This works out real well for the pharmaceutical industry because the patient never gets healed. They will always need treatment. They can live normally as long as they get the tri-threapy. If they stop they die. Those in the developed countries with money and insurance pay a lot.
So the drug companies get rich.

Those in poor countries who cannot afford treatment, die. Thereby the world population is reduced and especially in those areas where the NWO wants to control the population.

A couple of things to think about.

If a person carries typhoid fever, he/she is legally obligated to report this fact to local authorities. He she is forbidden to work in restaurants or other places that might spread the disease.

On the other hand, since it first appeared, AIDS which is much deadlier than Typhoid Fever, has been always given special treatment.

It is illegal for employers to even ask if a person has AIDS or is HIV positive. And it is illegal to deny someone employement in any field on the basis of the fact that they have AIDS or that they are HIV positive.

A person who is HIV positive or has AIDS is not legally required to inform others of that fact. Even before or even after having sex with them.

At one point in the early days of the spread of AIDS the American Medical Society actually announced that AIDS could not be spread by heterosexual sexual contact.

This of course was false, and certainly was not based on any sound research. For the AMS to have made such an irresponsible annoncement should have created a national scandal. But the press played it down.

The spread of AIDS can be traced back to three original infection sites.

South Africa
New York
San Francisco

Of those three original infections.

The one in Africa has been traced back to a massive smallpox innoculation.

The ones in New York and San Francisco have been traced back to experimental innoculations given to volunteers who were screened to exclude heterosexuals.

The original story that AIDS crossed over to humans through sexual contact with the African Green Monkey, has been shown not only to be false, but was known to be false even at the time it was being cited as the official explaination.

In fact HIV is much more closely related to the sheep "vishna" retrovirus, but has been genetically modified to infect humans.

All that to say this, AIDS is not a natural disease. It is manmade, and its spread has been greatly encouraged by the American medical community.

What's more, treatment of symptoms has been stressed while efforts to treat the cause, have been minimized.

And just by chance, all that creates a situation where millions of people in western society are dependant on continual costly treatment to stay alive, and millions of others in poor countries are dead or dying.

Sounds like global population engineering doesn't it?

I'll post supporting links separately.