> Though you could be right regarding the
> quake in question,
That WAS what started this discussion -- the quake in question. Would anyone here stake their LIFE on the belief that it was definitely and intentionally caused by the gov't?
"it is foolish indeed to"
Please don't talk to *me* about being "foolish" when you can't even identify yourself.
> Could the reference in Revelation include
> both definitions?
Never said that it wasn't possible or didn't; I was disputing that it was ONLY intended to mean the earth as in the land.