How can it not be in this Thread? Is it titled "Jackie's Phantom Post

> I already answered your MO's righteousness thing, you just
> missed it.

> Ha, It was a long time ago, and what I read at that time stuck
> in my mind. It is not insanity, I rather thought those letters
> you sent out were a bit off the wall.

> As I said I DID answer that one maybe you skipped over it in
> your hasty retreat back to find some answers.

> I will now

> Let's see now, 1975 was around when the FFing thing was getting
> off the ground with the King Arthur Series. Nope, it must have
> been after that. I remember where I was living, and the
> situation I was in, and as far as the tiing of that goes, I
> believe it was After Rachel defected from Emmanuel and TF and
> went her own way, and you had already been out for a number of
> years, long enough to gain your own following of loyal disciples
> of Joel who were
> printing and distributing your letters or so the reports from
> Berg said, and selling beads to support their homes.

> So that would have to have been well AFTER 1975. I Had two kids
> and one I remember was 2, she is now about 25
> so that would be 23 years ago, BINGO! 1984! Whaddya know?

> Was Rosetta the only child you had after that? Or maybe you sent
> a 9 year old picture?

> The Index? The Mo Letter Index? The obsolete piece of literature
> that MO thought was so great and the devil in his dream was
> trying to block out? THAT , you think is the Rosetta Stone? Now
> that is something to laugh about. YOu gotta be kidding right? NO
> way. No one believes that but you.

> Oh but the REAL Queen is in power and is ruling and reigning
> with Jesus now on this earth and sits in heavenly places with
> Him in the spirit.

> 20. MEANWHILE‚ EVERYBODY'S BEEN WONDERING WHATEVER HAPPENED TO
> THE GREAT QUEEN?! We've even begun to wonder about the
> "Great Queen Prophecy" itself‚ whether it has
> already been fulfilled, or whether it really applied to you or
> not, or perhaps to someone else, or even the Family—His New
> Bride, the "New Church"?!

> (763:20)