> She posted it in response to Andrew's
> thread, "Muslim newspaper ran cartoons
> 4 months ago".

> It's good you saw it, though. It means the
> story is getting out, because it shows just
> how hypocritical these riots and boycotts
> are.

What it shows is that the cartoons themselves did not really stir up the trouble. Nobody reacted immediately. The reaction came later after people stirred it up.
So who was involved?
.
.
.
Hamas was very involved.
Hamas is a creation of Mossad, and serves their interests.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/ZER403A.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/STE204A.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/EIR204A.html
.
.
.
The mythical "Al Qaida" has also been involved in stirring up opposition to the cartoons.
Al Quaida is the invention of of CIA/MOSSAD

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/qaeda_philippines.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/424614.stm
http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/june2004/062504falseflag.htm

In Iraq, 2 british SAS agents, disguised as Arabs, were caught by Iraqi police as they tried to set up a roadside bomb. The british then stormed the police station, killing several civilians, to release the agents.
Later, a British investigator who was investigating the incident died under mysterious circumstances.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1590220,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4264614.stm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=AKL20050930&articleId=1024
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20051017&articleId=1100

a breakdown of the suppose Al-Qaida London bombing
check the references to see how they support the story
http://www.rense.com/general66/blair.htm
.
.
.
Al Jezeera the big radio station in Qatar, (America's headquarters in the mideast), also played a big part in stirring up sentiment against the cartoons.

Al Jezeera is really a CIA front.
To the Arabs it pretends to be a moderate Arab voice, airing information from both sides of various issues.
In the west it is presented as being in league with terrorists.
But realisticly, Do you really believe that a "pro-terrorist" radio station could continue to exist in a tiny sheikdom that has no military, and just happens to be the headquarters of the US mideast invasion force?

Al Jezeera is used to influence both Arab and American thinking about the war.

It's english website reflects it's western origin.
http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/5D7F956E-6B52-46D9-8D17-448856D01CDB.htm

http://gnn.tv/articles/1727/Sleeping_with_the_Enemy

(george)
"EBW thinks it's the CIA and the Jews that
are manipulating things."

That statement is not accurate, unless by the term "the Jews" you mean the religious leadership who dominate both the state of Israel and international judaism.

This usage would be similar to the Biblical use of the term "the Jews" in reference to the religious leaders who hated and plotted to murder Christ.

Clearly in that usage, the term did not include the disciples or those who had no part in the conspiracy against Christ.

I myself make it a point never to use terms like "the Jews" when I refer to those involved in the present conspiracy to enslave mankind.

I do mention Mossad, the Pharisees, the Lubavitch organization, etc because they are directly involved.

I also mention gentile organizations like the CIA, the Bush League, the Council for National Policy, the Masons.... because they are involved.
Most Jews, even in Israel are secular and don't support that religious leadership. Nonetheless the Pharisees control the reins of power.

So to avoid confusion, when you wish to summarize my views, I would prefer that you do not use any ethnic references such as "the Jews".

The best all-inclusive term would be "the antichrists". For I make absolutely no distinction between gentile or Jewish ACs.