I didn't understand the animosity toward LaMattery when I first came to this board. It was difficult to tell, from the posts in opposition to him, if what was being said was merely biased or, in fact, true. I witnessed some intimidation by Jim from his posts, but that also could have an unfortunate result of the zealous nature of his efforts against TF. I think that it was EBW that first disclosed information that assisted me in seeing that Jim may not have been as sincere as he wished to portray himself. I also exchanged some emails with Jim, but he never threatened me or implied that I might have sexually abused anyone. However, I trust the truthfulness of all your experiences with him, and now with this charge regarding debts arising, new light has been shed on LaMattery's sincerity.

> I don't know who posted the above, and I'm
> against mud-slinging in general. It could
> be, though, that this poster's motive is not
> to sling mud, but simply to update what is
> already generally known about Jim LaMattery.
> The thing that got the guy into trouble here
> (and banned on other exer boards) was his
> dishonesty, opportunism, and self-promotion
> -- MASKING as a great crusader for abused
> Family members while serving his own agenda.
> What's being said about him on genx at the
> moment is that even his own family is
> starting to have their doubts.

> A recent article on the same site sums
> things up pretty nicely: