Return to Index Previous Next

NewDayNews Pro-Family

Ben Ladin funded by U.S.
By:Internetman
Date: Friday, 14 September 2001, 10:51 pm

Who Is Ousmane Bin Laden?

by Michel Chossudovsky

Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa

Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), Montréal

Posted 12 September 2001

A few hours after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade

Centre and the Pentagon, the Bush administration

concluded without supporting evidence, that "Ousmane bin

Laden and his al-Qaeda organisation were prime suspects".

CIA Director George Tenet stated that bin Laden has the

capacity to plan ``multiple attacks with little or no warning.''

Secretary of State Colin Powell called the attacks "an act of

war" and President Bush confirmed in an evening televised

address to the Nation that he would "make no distinction

between the terrorists who committed these acts and those

who harbor them". Former CIA Director James Woolsey

pointed his finger at "state sponsorship," implying the

complicity of one or more foreign governments. In the words

of former National Security Adviser, Lawrence Eagleburger,

"I think we will show when we get attacked like this, we are

terrible in our strength and in our retribution."

Meanwhile, parroting official statements, the Western media

mantra has approved the launching of "punitive actions"

directed against civilian targets in the Middle East. In the

words of William Saffire writing in the New York Times:

"When we reasonably determine our attackers' bases and

camps, we must pulverize them -- minimizing but accepting

the risk of collateral damage" -- and act overtly or covertly to

destabilize terror's national hosts".

The following text outlines the history of Ousmane Bin

Laden and the links of the Islamic "Jihad" to the formulation

of US foreign policy during the Cold War and its aftermath.

Prime suspect in the New York and Washington terrorists

attacks, branded by the FBI as an "international terrorist" for

his role in the African US embassy bombings, Saudi born

Ousmane bin Laden was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan

war "ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet

invaders". 1

In 1979 "the largest covert operation in the history of the

CIA" was launched in response to the Soviet invasion of

Afghanistan in support of the pro-Communist government of

Babrak Kamal.2:

With the active encouragement of the CIA and

Pakistan's ISI [Inter Services Intelligence], who

wanted to turn the Afghan jihad into a global war

waged by all Muslim states against the Soviet

Union, some 35,000 Muslim radicals from 40

Islamic countries joined Afghanistan's fight

between 1982 and 1992. Tens of thousands more

came to study in Pakistani madrasahs. Eventually

more than 100,000 foreign Muslim radicals were

directly influenced by the Afghan jihad.3

The Islamic "jihad" was supported by the United States and

Saudi Arabia with a significant part of the funding generated

from the Golden Crescent drug trade:

In March 1985, President Reagan signed National

Security Decision Directive 166,...[which]

authorize[d] stepped-up covert military aid to the

mujahideen, and it made clear that the secret

Afghan war had a new goal: to defeat Soviet

troops in Afghanistan through covert action and

encourage a Soviet withdrawal. The new covert

U.S. assistance began with a dramatic increase in

arms supplies -- a steady rise to 65,000 tons

annually by 1987, ... as well as a "ceaseless

stream" of CIA and Pentagon specialists who

traveled to the secret headquarters of Pakistan's

ISI on the main road near Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

There the CIA specialists met with Pakistani

intelligence officers to help plan operations for the

Afghan rebels.4

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) using Pakistan's

military Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) played a key role in

training the Mujahideen. In turn, the CIA sponsored guerrilla

training was integrated with the teachings of Islam:

Predominant themes were that Islam was a

complete socio-political ideology, that holy Islam

was being violated by the atheistic Soviet troops,

and that the Islamic people of Afghanistan should

reassert their independence by overthrowing the

leftist Afghan regime propped up by Moscow.5

Pakistan's Intelligence Apparatus

Pakistan's ISI was used as a "go-between". The CIA covert

support to the "jihad" operated indirectly through the

Pakistani ISI, --i.e. the CIA did not channel its support

directly to the Mujahideen. In other words, for these covert

operations to be "successful", Washington was careful not

to reveal the ultimate objective of the "jihad", which

consisted in destroying the Soviet Union.

In the words of CIA's Milton Beardman "We didn't train

Arabs". Yet according to Abdel Monam Saidali, of the

Al-aram Center for Strategic Studies in Cairo, bin Laden

and the "Afghan Arabs" had been imparted "with very

sophisticated types of training that was allowed to them by

the CIA" 6

CIA's Beardman confirmed, in this regard, that Ousmane bin

Laden was not aware of the role he was playing on behalf

of Washington. In the words of bin Laden (quoted by

Beardman): "neither I, nor my brothers saw evidence of

American help". 7

Motivated by nationalism and religious fervor, the Islamic

warriors were unaware that they were fighting the Soviet

Army on behalf of Uncle Sam. While there were contacts at

the upper levels of the intelligence hierarchy, Islamic rebel

leaders in theatre had no contacts with Washington or the

CIA.

With CIA backing and the funneling of massive amounts of

US military aid, the Pakistani ISI had developed into a

"parallel structure wielding enormous power over all aspects

of government". 8 The ISI had a staff composed of military

and intelligence officers, bureaucrats, undercover agents

and informers, estimated at 150,000. 9

Meanwhile, CIA operations had also reinforced the

Pakistani military regime led by General Zia Ul Haq:

'Relations between the CIA and the ISI [Pakistan's

military intelligence] had grown increasingly warm

following [General] Zia's ouster of Bhutto and the

advent of the military regime,'... During most of

the Afghan war, Pakistan was more aggressively

anti-Soviet than even the United States. Soon

after the Soviet military invaded Afghanistan in

1980, Zia [ul Haq] sent his ISI chief to destabilize

the Soviet Central Asian states. The CIA only

agreed to this plan in October 1984.... `the CIA

was more cautious than the Pakistanis.' Both

Pakistan and the United States took the line of

deception on Afghanistan with a public posture of

negotiating a settlement while privately agreeing

that military escalation was the best course.10

The Golden Crescent Drug Triangle

The history of the drug trade in Central Asia is intimately

related to the CIA's covert operations. Prior to the

Soviet-Afghan war, opium production in Afghanistan and

Pakistan was directed to small regional markets. There was

no local production of heroin. 11 In this regard, Alfred

McCoy's study confirms that within two years of the

onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, "the

Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world's top

heroin producer, supplying 60 percent of U.S. demand. In

Pakistan, the heroin-addict population went from near zero

in 1979... to 1.2 million by 1985 -- a much steeper rise than

in any other nation":12

CIA assets again controlled this heroin trade. As

the Mujahideen guerrillas seized territory inside

Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant

opium as a revolutionary tax. Across the border in

Pakistan, Afghan leaders and local syndicates

under the protection of Pakistan Intelligence

operated hundreds of heroin laboratories. During

this decade of wide-open drug-dealing, the U.S.

Drug Enforcement Agency in Islamabad failed to

instigate major seizures or arrests ... U.S. officials

had refused to investigate charges of heroin

dealing by its Afghan allies `because U.S.

narcotics policy in Afghanistan has been

subordinated to the war against Soviet influence

there.' In 1995, the former CIA director of the

Afghan operation, Charles Cogan, admitted the

CIA had indeed sacrificed the drug war to fight the

Cold War. `Our main mission was to do as much

damage as possible to the Soviets. We didn't

really have the resources or the time to devote to

an investigation of the drug trade,'... `I don't think

that we need to apologize for this. Every situation

has its fallout.... There was fallout in terms of

drugs, yes. But the main objective was

accomplished. The Soviets left Afghanistan.'13

In the Wake of the Cold War

In the wake of the Cold War, the Central Asian region is not

only strategic for its extensive oil reserves, it also produces

three quarters of the World's opium representing multibillion

dollar revenues to business syndicates, financial

institutions, intelligence agencies and organized crime. The

annual proceeds of the Golden Crescent drug trade

(between 100 and 200 billion dollars) represents

approximately one third of the Worldwide annual turnover of

narcotics, estimated by the United Nations to be of the

order of $500 billion.14

With the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a new surge in

opium production has unfolded. (According to UN estimates,

the production of opium in Afghanistan in 1998-99 --

coinciding with the build up of armed insurgencies in the

former Soviet republics-- reached a record high of 4600

metric tons.15 Powerful business syndicates in the former

Soviet Union allied with organized crime are competing for

the strategic control over the heroin routes.

The ISI's extensive intelligence military-network was not

dismantled in the wake of the Cold War. The CIA continued

to support the Islamic "jihad" out of Pakistan. New

undercover initiatives were set in motion in Central Asia, the

Caucasus and the Balkans. Pakistan's military and

intelligence apparatus essentially "served as a catalyst for

the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the emergence of

six new Muslim republics in Central Asia." 16.

Meanwhile, Islamic missionaries of the Wahhabi sect from

Saudi Arabia had established themselves in the Muslim

republics as well as within the Russian federation

encroaching upon the institutions of the secular State.

Despite its anti-American ideology, Islamic fundamentalism

was largely serving Washington's strategic interests in the

former Soviet Union.

Following the withdrawal of Soviet troops in 1989, the civil

war in Afghanistan continued unabated. The Taliban were

being supported by the Pakistani Deobandis and their

political party the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam (JUI). In 1993,

JUI entered the government coalition of Prime Minister

Benazzir Bhutto. Ties between JUI, the Army and ISI were

established. In 1995, with the downfall of the Hezb-I-Islami

Hektmatyar government in Kabul, the Taliban not only

instated a hardline Islamic government, they also "handed

control of training camps in Afghanistan over to JUI

factions..." 17

And the JUI with the support of the Saudi Wahhabi

movements played a key role in recruiting volunteers to fight

in the Balkans and the former Soviet Union.

Jane Defense Weekly confirms in this regard that "half of

Taliban manpower and equipment originate[d] in Pakistan

under the ISI" 18

In fact, it would appear that following the Soviet withdrawal

both sides in the Afghan civil war continued to receive

covert support through Pakistan's ISI. 19

In other words, backed by Pakistan's military intelligence

(ISI) which in turn was controlled by the CIA, the Taliban

Islamic State was largely serving American geopolitical

interests. The Golden Crescent drug trade was also being

used to finance and equip the Bosnian Muslim Army

(starting in the early 1990s) and the Kosovo Liberation Army

(KLA). In last few months there is evidence that Mujahideen

mercenaries are fighting in the ranks of KLA-NLA terrorists

in their assaults into Macedonia.

No doubt, this explains why Washington has closed its eyes

on the reign of terror imposed by the Taliban including the

blatant derogation of women's rights, the closing down of

schools for girls, the dismissal of women employees from

government offices and the enforcement of "the Sharia laws

of punishment".20

The War in Chechnya

With regard to Chechnya, the main rebel leaders Shamil

Basayev and Al Khattab were trained and indoctrinated in

CIA sponsored camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

According to Yossef Bodansky, director of the U.S.

Congress's Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional

Warfare, the war in Chechnya had been planned during a

secret summit of HizbAllah International held in 1996 in

Mogadishu, Somalia. 21 The summit, was attended by

Osama bin Laden and high-ranking Iranian and Pakistani

intelligence officers. In this regard, the involvement of

Pakistan's ISI in Chechnya "goes far beyond supplying the

Chechens with weapons and expertise: the ISI and its

radical Islamic proxies are actually calling the shots in this

war". 22

Russia's main pipeline route transits through Chechnya and

Dagestan. Despite Washington's perfunctory condemnation

of Islamic terrorism, the indirect beneficiaries of the

Chechen war are the Anglo-American oil conglomerates

which are vying for control over oil resources and pipeline

corridors out of the Caspian Sea basin.

The two main Chechen rebel armies (respectively led by

Commander Shamil Basayev and Emir Khattab) estimated

at 35,000 strong were supported by Pakistan's ISI, which

also played a key role in organizing and training the

Chechen rebel army:

[In 1994] the Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence

arranged for Basayev and his trusted lieutenants

to undergo intensive Islamic indoctrination and

training in guerrilla warfare in the Khost province

of Afghanistan at Amir Muawia camp, set up in the

early 1980s by the CIA and ISI and run by famous

Afghani warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. In July

1994, upon graduating from Amir Muawia,

Basayev was transferred to Markaz-i-Dawar camp

in Pakistan to undergo training in advanced

guerrilla tactics. In Pakistan, Basayev met the

highest ranking Pakistani military and intelligence

officers: Minister of Defense General Aftab

Shahban Mirani, Minister of Interior General

Naserullah Babar, and the head of the ISI branch

in charge of supporting Islamic causes, General

Javed Ashraf, (all now retired). High-level

connections soon proved very useful to

Basayev.23

Following his training and indoctrination stint, Basayev was

assigned to lead the assault against Russian federal troops

in the first Chechen war in 1995. His organization had also

developed extensive links to criminal syndicates in Moscow

as well as ties to Albanian organized crime and the Kosovo

Liberation Army (KLA). In 1997-98, according to Russia's

Federal Security Service (FSB) "Chechen warlords started

buying up real estate in Kosovo... through several real

estate firms registered as a cover in Yugoslavia" 24

Basayev's organisation has also been involved in a number

of rackets including narcotics, illegal tapping and sabotage

of Russia's oil pipelines, kidnapping, prostitution, trade in

counterfeit dollars and the smuggling of nuclear materials

(See Mafia linked to Albania's collapsed pyramids, 25

Alongside the extensive laundering of drug money, the

proceeds of various illicit activities have been funneled

towards the recruitment of mercenaries and the purchase of

weapons.

During his training in Afghanistan, Shamil Basayev linked

up with Saudi born veteran Mujahideen Commander "Al

Khattab" who had fought as a volunteer in Afghanistan.

Barely a few months after Basayev's return to Grozny,

Khattab was invited (early 1995) to set up an army base in

Chechnya for the training of Mujahideen fighters. According

to the BBC, Khattab's posting to Chechnya had been

"arranged through the Saudi-Arabian based [International]

Islamic Relief Organisation, a militant religious organisation,

funded by mosques and rich individuals which channeled

funds into Chechnya".26

Concluding Remarks

Since the Cold War era, Washington has consciously

supported Ousmane bin Laden, while at same time placing

him on the FBI's "most wanted list" as the World's foremost

terrorist.

While the Mujahideen are busy fighting America's war in the

Balkans and the former Soviet Union, the FBI --operating as

a US based Police Force- is waging a domestic war against

terrorism, operating in some respects independently of the

CIA which has --since the Soviet-Afghan war-- supported

international terrorism through its covert operations.

In a cruel irony, while the Islamic jihad --featured by the

Bush Adminstration as "a threat to America"-- is blamed for

the terrorist assaults on the World Trade Centre and the

Pentagon, these same Islamic organisations constitute a

key instrument of US military-intelligence operations in the

Balkans and the former Soviet Union.

In the wake of the terrorist attacks in New York and

Washington, the truth must prevail to prevent the Bush

Adminstration together with its NATO partners from

embarking upon a military adventure which threatens the

future of humanity.

Endnotes

1.Hugh Davies, International: `Informers' point the finger

at bin Laden; Washington on alert for suicide bombers,

The Daily Telegraph, London, 24 August 1998.

2.See Fred Halliday, "The Un-great game: the Country

that lost the Cold War, Afghanistan, New Republic, 25

March 1996):

3.Ahmed Rashid, The Taliban: Exporting Extremism,

Foreign Affairs, November-December 1999.

4.Steve Coll, Washington Post, July 19, 1992.

5.Dilip Hiro, Fallout from the Afghan Jihad, Inter Press

Services, 21 November 1995.

6.Weekend Sunday (NPR); Eric Weiner, Ted Clark; 16

August 1998.

7.Ibid.

8.Dipankar Banerjee; Possible Connection of ISI With

Drug Industry, India Abroad, 2 December 1994.

9.Ibid

10.See Diego Cordovez and Selig Harrison, Out of

Afghanistan: The Inside Story of the Soviet

Withdrawal, Oxford university Press, New York, 1995.

See also the review of Cordovez and Harrison in

International Press Services, 22 August 1995.

11.Alfred McCoy, Drug fallout: the CIA's Forty Year

Complicity in the Narcotics Trade. The Progressive; 1

August 1997.

12.Ibid

13.Ibid.

14.Douglas Keh, Drug Money in a changing World,

Technical document no 4, 1998, Vienna UNDCP, p. 4.

See also Report of the International Narcotics Control

Board for 1999, E/INCB/1999/1 United Nations

Publication, Vienna 1999, p 49-51, And Richard

Lapper, UN Fears Growth of Heroin Trade, Financial

Times, 24 February 2000.

15.Report of the International Narcotics Control Board, op

cit, p 49-51, see also Richard Lapper, op. cit.

16.International Press Services, 22 August 1995.

17.Ahmed Rashid, The Taliban: Exporting Extremism,

Foreign Affairs, November- December, 1999, p. 22.

18.Quoted in the Christian Science Monitor, 3 September

1998)

19.Tim McGirk, Kabul learns to live with its bearded

conquerors, The Independent, London, 6

November1996.

20.See K. Subrahmanyam, Pakistan is Pursuing Asian

Goals, India Abroad, 3 November 1995.

21.Levon Sevunts, Who's calling the shots?: Chechen

conflict finds Islamic roots in Afghanistan and Pakistan,

23 The Gazette, Montreal, 26 October 1999..

22.Ibid

23.Ibid.

24.See Vitaly Romanov and Viktor Yadukha, Chechen

Front Moves To Kosovo Segodnia, Moscow, 23 Feb

2000.

25.The European, 13 February 1997, See also Itar-Tass,

4-5 January 2000.

26.BBC, 29 September 1999).

The URL of this article is:

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html

Copyright Michel Chossudovsky, Montreal, September

2001. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to post this

text on non-commercial community internet sites, provided

the source and the URL are indicated, the essay remains

intact and the copyright note is displayed. To publish this

text in printed and/or other forms, including commercial

internet sites and excerpts, contact the author at

chossudovsky@videotron.ca, fax: 1-514-4256224.

Password: